SCI8 Q2W5D2: The Law of Octaves

By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

1. Describe John Newlands’ Law of Octaves and its basis in ordering elements by increasing atomic mass.
2. Analyze sequences of elements to identify 8-step repetitions in properties and explain the observed pattern.
3. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the Law of Octaves compared with later classifications.

• Octave – a repeating sequence where the 8th member resembles the 1st in key properties.
• Law of Octaves – Newlands’ proposal that every 8th element shows similar properties when arranged by increasing atomic mass.
• Periodicity – recurring trends in properties at regular intervals.
• Newlands – English chemist (1864) who arranged elements by mass and noticed 8-step repetitions.

Counting with Music

1. List the days of the week. What comes after the 7th day?
2. Say the syllables: Do–Re–Mi–Fa–Sol–La–Ti. What comes next?
3. How is a repeating cycle like this helpful for organizing information?

Show Answer

1) The cycle repeats with the first day again. 2) The sequence returns to Do in a higher register. 3) Repeating cycles help predict what comes next; Newlands used this idea for elements.

1) Why look for a repeating count?

Imagine walking through a market with no labels. Sellers shout different prices, items are scattered, and nothing is grouped. Finding what you need takes time and guesswork. A good system reduces confusion by arranging things so that similarities cluster together and differences stand apart. Chemists in the 1800s had the same problem with elements. They were discovering more and more, but without a reliable layout the list felt like that messy market. What pattern could reveal order?

One simple idea is to put elements in order by a single measurable quantity. In the mid-1800s, the most widely used number was atomic mass. Lining the elements up by increasing mass creates a single-file line. But does anything repeat at predictable steps along that line?

Guiding question: If you arrange items by one number alone, what signs would convince you that a deeper pattern is present?

Show Answer

If properties recur at fixed intervals as the number increases, that suggests a hidden cycle beneath the list.

---

2) Newlands’ observation

John Newlands arranged known elements by increasing mass and noticed that properties seemed to repeat after every seven steps so that the 8th resembled the 1st. This is like hearing a melody climb seven notes and landing back on a familiar tone at the eighth. He proposed that, as you count forward along the mass-ordered list, element n and element n + 8 tend to share important traits.

Symbolically, Newlands’ claim can be summarized as a position relationship along a numbered list:

$P\left(n\right)\approx P(n+8)$

Here, P(n) stands for the set of characteristic properties at position n when the elements are listed by increasing mass. The claim is not that values are identical, but that key behaviors echo every eighth place. This idea reached further than earlier three-member groupings because it proposed a repeating interval across much of the list.

Checkpoint: What does the symbol “≈” suggest about the match between properties at positions n and n + 8?

Show Answer

It signals similarity rather than exact equality. The repetition is approximate but meaningful.

---

3) Seeing the pattern in simple runs

Consider a short run of lighter elements in order of increasing mass. As you count forward, look at pairs eight places apart and compare their behavior in reactions or compounds. For example, Lithium and Sodium both form soluble salts with halogens and react vigorously with water; Carbon and Silicon both form dioxides and extensive covalent networks; Nitrogen and Phosphorus both form trivalent hydrides and oxides. These echoes are exactly what Newlands had in mind.

To ground the idea, here is a compact way to express the 8-step relation for positions along the list:

$n\to n+8$

The arrow marks the jump you apply repeatedly as you scan the ordered sequence.

Guiding question: If a repeating interval exists, how could it help you predict the behavior of an element you know little about?

Show Answer

You could estimate its behavior by comparing it with the element eight places earlier, using the known one as a guide.

---

4) Worked comparisons using the 8-step idea

Lithium and Sodium. When ordered by mass, Sodium appears eight positions after Lithium in Newlands’ table. Both are soft metals that form basic oxides and hydroxides, and both displace hydrogen from water. Their salts are typically soluble and they form similar chlorides.

Carbon and Silicon. Carbon at position n, Silicon near n + 8, share tetravalency and create extended structures (graphite or diamond for Carbon; silicate frameworks and silicon dioxide networks for Silicon).

Nitrogen and Phosphorus. Both prefer three covalent bonds in common compounds and form analogous oxides and hydrides (NH₃ and PH₃), showing parallel chemistry.

These alignments encouraged chemists to view the list as periodic, not random.

---

5) Why eight?

Newlands used a counting argument from the data available at the time. The lighter elements presented visible clusters where the eighth resembled the first. He chose a simple descriptive rule: step through the list by ones; every time you move forward seven places, expect the next to echo the starting one. The choice of eight was empirical, based on observation rather than a deep theoretical reason available then.

Checkpoint: If you were only allowed to use ordered lists and simple counting, what limitations might arise?

Show Answer

Certain families may drift out of alignment as more elements are added or as measurement improves, especially for heavier elements with more complicated behaviors.

---

6) Where the pattern works best

The 8-step similarity is clearest in the lighter part of the list. Alkali metals such as Lithium and Sodium track well; halogens such as Fluorine and Chlorine show strong correspondence; the Carbon–Silicon and Nitrogen–Phosphorus pairs mirror each other in bonding patterns and common compound types. In these regions, the rule is helpful for grouping and for quick mental predictions.

In a simplified way, you can summarize the leap as a modular count over the ordered positions:

$n+8=n(mod 8)$

This notation emphasizes the idea of repeating classes separated by a fixed interval along the sequence.

---

7) Where the pattern strains or fails

As the list extends, transition metals appear. Their properties vary in ways that do not line up cleanly with a simple 8-step count, and heavier elements introduce further mismatches. In some places, the rule lumps together elements whose chemistry differs widely. These mismatches drew criticism because a useful organizing rule should not force strong dissimilarities into the same group.

Guiding question: What should a scientist do when data agree in one region but disagree elsewhere?

Show Answer

Report the agreement and the disagreement, use the rule where it helps, and keep searching for a framework that explains more cases with fewer exceptions.

---

8) Interpreting the idea with simple position arithmetic

If the ordered positions are counted as 1, 2, 3, …, then any block of eight forms a set: {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8}, {9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16}, and so on. Elements at positions 1, 9, 17, … form one repeating column; positions 2, 10, 18, … form another; and so forth. In compact arithmetic form for a column index k between 1 and 8:

$n=k+8t$

where t is a whole number counting how many full blocks of eight you have passed. Newlands’ insight is that entries with the same k often behave alike, especially for smaller values of n.

Checkpoint: If k = 1 corresponds to Lithium, which later member shares its column in this scheme?

Show Answer

Position 9 in the next block, which corresponds to Sodium, the next alkali metal.

---

9) Discovery tasks

Task A: Compare pairs separated by eight steps among lighter elements: Li–Na, C–Si, N–P, O–S, F–Cl. For each pair, write two similarities in common reactions or common compounds.

Show Answer

• Li–Na: both react with water to form hydroxides; both form soluble chlorides.
• C–Si: both form dioxides and extensive covalent networks; both serve as backbones in major materials (organic frameworks vs. silicates).
• N–P: both form trivalent hydrides and pentavalent oxides; both show covalent bonding in many compounds.
• O–S: both form acids with hydrogen (H₂O vs. H₂S) and oxo-acids; both act as nonmetal oxidizers.
• F–Cl: both are halogens; both form salts with alkali metals and exist as diatomic molecules in elemental form.

Task B: Find one example where the eight-step repetition groups dissimilar elements and explain why that is a problem for classification.

Show Answer

Oxygen grouped with Iron is a classic mismatch. Their chemistry differs strongly, showing the counting rule can force poor pairings and needs revision.

---

10) Numerical expressions that support comparison

Although the rule is qualitative, you can express the repeated stepping compactly with position arithmetic. If you label a starting position as n, then the “similar” positions are n + 8, n + 16, n + 24, … A general term is:

$n+8t$

for whole-number values of t. This simple form captures the ladder-like repetition Newlands described.

---

11) Mini-summaries

• Arranging by mass provides a single line to scan for repetition.
• Newlands reported an echo at eight-step intervals among lighter elements.
• The idea works best early in the list and becomes unreliable among heavier and transition elements.
• The rule helped establish the expectation that properties repeat in regular intervals.

---

12) Short application scenarios

Construction: Materials can be grouped by repeating performance bands; a builder anticipating the next tier can predict suitable uses. Sports: Training cycles repeat over weeks; coaches expect patterns in performance peaks. Design: Iterations of a product often cycle through features; patterns guide the next version. In each case, a repeating interval helps planning, just as an 8-step repetition helped early chemists predict similarities.

---

13) Checkpoints

Q1: What is the core claim of the 8-step rule?

Show Answer

Properties at position n resemble those at position n + 8 in a mass-ordered list, especially for lighter elements.

Q2: Name two pairs that illustrate it clearly.

Show Answer

Li–Na and C–Si are classic pairs.

Q3: Why does the rule falter later in the list?

Show Answer

Because transition series and heavier elements introduce complexities that simple counting does not capture.

---

14) References

• Chang, R., & Goldsby, K. (2014). General Chemistry: The Essential Concepts. McGraw-Hill.
• NagwaEd. History of the periodic table.
• Science Notes and Projects. Element discovery timelines.
• BYJU’S. Classification of elements in the modern periodic table.

Worked Example 1 – Lithium and Sodium

Count forward from Lithium to the eighth position; compare behaviors.

Show Answer

Both are alkali metals that react with water to form hydroxides and hydrogen gas; both form soluble halide salts. They fit the 8-step repetition.

Worked Example 2 – Nitrogen and Phosphorus

Show Answer

Both form trivalent hydrides (NH₃, PH₃) and analogous oxides; both occupy the same family in later tables.

Worked Example 3 – Carbon and Silicon

Show Answer

Both show tetravalency, form dioxides (CO₂, SiO₂), and create extended networks (graphite/diamond vs. silicates).

Worked Example 4 – Oxygen and Sulfur

Show Answer

Both are nonmetals that form acids with hydrogen and serve as oxidants in many reactions.

Worked Example 5 – Fluorine and Chlorine

Show Answer

Both are halogens; both form salts with alkali metals and exist as diatomic molecules.

Now You Try (5)

1. Sodium and Potassium
2. Magnesium and Calcium
3. Aluminum and Gallium
4. Chlorine and Bromine
5. Iron and Ruthenium

Show Answer

• Both are alkali metals → fits the repetition.
• Both are alkaline earth metals → fits the repetition.
• Both commonly form trivalent compounds → fits the repetition.
• Both are halogens → fits the repetition.
• Transition metals do not follow the simple 8-step pattern → does not fit.

1. Lithium and Sodium
   Show Answer

   Yes. Both alkali metals; similar salts and reactivity.
2. Nitrogen and Phosphorus
   Show Answer

   Yes. Both nonmetals in the same family with analogous compounds.
3. Oxygen and Sulfur
   Show Answer

   Yes. Nonmetals forming analogous oxides and hydrides.
4. Fluorine and Chlorine
   Show Answer

   Yes. Halogens with similar reactivity.
5. Carbon and Silicon
   Show Answer

   Yes. Tetravalent; form dioxides; network-forming.
6. Magnesium and Calcium
   Show Answer

   Yes. Alkaline earth metals with parallel chemistry.
7. Sodium and Potassium
   Show Answer

   Yes. Alkali metals; vigorous with water.
8. Aluminum and Gallium
   Show Answer

   Yes. Common trivalent compounds and similar bonding.
9. Iron and Ruthenium
   Show Answer

   No. Transition metals break the simple 8-step repetition.
10. Chlorine and Bromine
    Show Answer

    Yes. Halogens; similar salts and diatomic form.

1. Who proposed the Law of Octaves?
   Show Answer

   John Newlands.
2. In what year was it proposed?
   Show Answer

   1864.
3. State the main claim of the law.
   Show Answer

   Every eighth element shows similar properties when elements are arranged by increasing mass.
4. Why use the term “octave”?
   Show Answer

   Because the repetition resembles an eight-step cycle like musical notes.
5. Do Lithium and Sodium fit the repetition?
   Show Answer

   Yes. Both are alkali metals.
6. Do Nitrogen and Phosphorus fit it?
   Show Answer

   Yes. Both in the same family with comparable compounds.
7. Why does the rule fail for heavier elements?
   Show Answer

   Transition series and complex behaviors disrupt the simple count.
8. Name a mismatched grouping that reveals a weakness.
   Show Answer

   Oxygen grouped with Iron.
9. What larger concept did the law introduce?
   Show Answer

   Periodicity of properties.
10. Give a daily-life analogy for such cycles.
    Show Answer

    Days of the week repeat in a fixed interval.
11. Compare Carbon and Silicon.
    Show Answer

    Both are tetravalent and form dioxides and networks.
12. State a strength of the law.
    Show Answer

    It extended recognition of repeating properties beyond small groups.
13. State a weakness of the law.
    Show Answer

    It forced dissimilar elements together and failed for many metals.
14. How did this idea influence later classification?
    Show Answer

    It encouraged the search for a more accurate periodic arrangement.
15. Fill in the blank: The law was an early step toward the modern ________.
    Show Answer

    Periodic table.

1. Music and Chemistry Connection
   Show Answer

   The cycle repeats every eight steps; pairs like Li–Na mirror Do–Do across an octave.
2. Build Your Own Octave Table
   Show Answer

   Circle every 8th element among the first 20; Li–Na, N–P, O–S appear as matching pairs; mismatches increase beyond Ca.
3. Science Timeline Project
   Show Answer

   Include triads (1817), octaves (1864), periodic law (1869), atomic number (1913).
4. Everyday Cycles
   Show Answer

   Seasons, traffic lights, calendar months; each repeats and helps planning, similar to early element cycles.
5. Critic or Supporter?
   Show Answer

   Support: highlights periodic behavior; Critique: misplaces many elements and fails for transition series.

Notebook Task (3–2–1):

• 3 things I learned about the Law of Octaves
• 2 questions I still have about its limitations
• 1 connection between repeating cycles and my daily life